Table of contents

How it works

frame|An example of mipmapping: the principal image on the left is accompanied by copies at reduced sizes.

Each bitmap image of the mipmap set is a version of the main texture, but at a certain reduced level of detail. Although the main texture would still be used when the view is sufficient to render it in full detail, the renderer will switch to a suitable mipmap image (or in fact, interpolate between the two nearest) when the texture is viewed from a distance, or at a small size.

Rendering speed increases, since the number of texture pixels (texel) being processed can be much lower than with simple textures. Artifacts are reduced, since the mipmap images are effectively already anti-aliased, taking some of the burden off the real-time renderer.

If the texture has a basic size of 256 by 256 pixels (textures are typically squared and must have side lengths equal to a power of 2), then the associated mipmap may contain a series of 8 images, each half the size of the previous one: 128×128 pixels, 64×64, 32×32, 16×16, 8×8, 4×4, 2×2, 1×1 (a single pixel).

The easiest way to make these textures is using the so called The .DDStools.

For Programmers

If, for example, a scene is rendering this texture in a size of 40×40 pixels, then an interpolation of the 64×64 and the 32×32 mipmaps would be used. The simplest way to generate these textures is by successive averaging, however more sophisticated algorithms (perhaps based on signal processing and Fourier transforms) can also be used.

The increase in storage space required to store all of theses mipmaps for a texture is a third, because the sum of the areas 1/4 + 1/16 + 1/256 + ... converges to 1/3. (This assumes image compression is not being used.) This is a major advantage of this selection of resolutions. However, in many cases, the filtering should not be uniform in each direction (it should be anisotropic, as opposed to isotropic) and a compromise resolution is used. If a higher resolution is used, the cache coherence goes down and the aliasing is increased in one direction, but the image tends to be clearer. If a lower resolution is used, the cache coherence is improved, but the image is overly blurry, to the point where it becomes difficult to identify.

To help with this problem, nonuniform mipmaps (also known as rip-maps) are sometimes used. With a 16×16 base texture map, the rip-map resolutions would be 16×8, 16×4, 16×2, 16×1, 8×16, 8×8, 8×4, 8×2, 8×1, 4×16, 4×8, 4×4, 4×2, 4×1, 2×16, 2×8, 2×4, 2×2, 2×1, 1×16, 1×8, 1×4, 1×2 and 1×1.

The unfortunate problem with this approach is that rip-maps require four times as much memory as the base texture map and so rip-maps are very unpopular.

To reduce the memory requirement and simultaneously give more resolutions to work with, summed-area tables were conceived. Given a texture <math>(t_{jk})</math>, we can build a summed area table <math>(s_{jk})</math> as follows. The summed area table has the same number of entries as there are texels in the texture map. Then, define:

Unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula. Error 4

The average of the texels in the rectangle (a1,b1] × (a2,b2] is given by:

Unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula. Error 4

However, this approach tends to exhibit poor cache behavior. Also, a summed area table needs to have wider types to store the partial sums Unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula. Error 4 than the word size used to store Unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula. Error 4 . For these reasons, there isn't any hardware that implements summed-area tables today.

A compromise has been reached today, called anisotropic mip-mapping. In the case where an anisotropic filter is needed, a higher resolution mipmap is used and several texels are averaged in one direction to get more filtering in that direction. This has a somewhat detrimental effect on the cache, but greatly improves image quality.